What's the full story behind China's open-weight strategy?
Chinese labs have embraced open weights more than almost anyone, and I haven't heard an explanation that fully satisfies me. There are three common ones. šš¼šŗšŗš¼š±š¶šš¶šš² ššµš² š°š¼šŗš½š¹š²šŗš²š»š. This is why open models make sense for chipmakers: better free models sell more GPUs. China's chipmakers aren't there yet. The closer fit is cloud: Chinese hyperscalers sell compute, and open models bring customers to it. But that doesn't explain independent chinese labs, which have no cloud business to feed and have done as much as anyone to drive the trend. šš±š¶šš¼šæš¶š®š¹ š°š¼š»ššæš¼š¹. The theory is that open models spread Chinese framing on sensitive topics. But open weights are the weakest way to control outputs, since anyone can fine-tune the censorship out, and people have. A closed API would give far more control. š š¹š¼šš š¹š²š®š±š²šæ šš¼ šš»š±š²šæš°šš šŖš²ššš²šæš» š¹š®šÆš. Loss leaders get recouped through lock-in later, and open weights create almost none. This also assumes a coordinated plan among companies that compete hard with each other. My bigger issue is that each of these explains a motive, not a strategy. A well-considered strategy should tell you what winning looks like, and why it still pays off if the future unfolds differently than expected. So I'd love to see someone walk through how open weights play out under a few different futures: š¦š°š²š»š®šæš¶š¼ š: š š¼š±š²š¹š šÆš²š°š¼šŗš² š°šµš²š®š½ š°š¼šŗšŗš¼š±š¶šš¶š²š. Capability converges and the value moves to applications, deployment, and hardware. š¦š°š²š»š®šæš¶š¼ š®: š§šµš² š³šæš¼š»šš¶š²šæ šøš²š²š½š š°š¼šŗš½š¼šš»š±š¶š»š“. Whoever leads stays ahead, and the best model is worth far more than the second-best. š¦š°š²š»š®šæš¶š¼ šÆ: š§šµš² šš¼šæš¹š± šš½š¹š¶šš š¶š»šš¼ šš²š½š®šæš®šš² šš š²š°š¼ššššš²šŗš. The question becomes whose stack everyone else builds on. What does China get in each, and how would they adjust if the future they're betting on doesn't arrive? My assumption is that there is a more defined strategy that accounts for these, but I have not seen much published on this. Has anyone seen a compelling explanation?